Specificity in ESP
How
is specificity related to ESP? What is its role in the teaching-learning
process?
According
to Oxford dictionary, specificity can be taken as the quality of belonging or relating uniquely to a particular subject.
Having this definition, it can be said that specificity is related to ESP
(English for Specific Purposes) because it involves having or focusing on
specific topics according to the field of expertise.
Now, what is its role in the teaching and learning process?
Cheng
(2011) presents the following figure to highlight the interaction that exists
among the basic considerations in ESP teaching and learning. These factors were
established, in order to organize the different aspects that happen and correlate
during the process. These specific considerations remind us of what goes on in
the classroom. For some people may be obvious to some extend because those thoughts
are all the elements that are faced every day in the teaching lives. Yet, for
some reason they have become so obvious that in some cases are forgotten or
taken for granted by some teachers and administrators. Specificity brings back
the light to these factors that are supposed to guide the process of learning
and teaching, and should have never been overlooked.
If
we pay attention to the image, it can be noted that all the considerations: social
milieu, learning objectives, input materials and out activities, assessing
student learning, and methodologies, can be summarized in students’ needs and
situation analysis. These two aspects enclose all the others and relate in a well-organized
syllabus. ESP takes or should take into
account all the steps in order to give the best and most specialized course serving
and answering to the students’ needs in a specific context and situation.
Specificity
is not just being “specific” in the class at random, there has to be an
objective. For example, Hutchinson and Waters
(1987), wrote different articles in regards to the controversy of the topics,
and argued that “the fact the language is used for specific purposes does not imply
that it is a special form of the language”. Taking this into account, it can be
said that having only one view or modality can be sometimes demotivating or
even irrelevant for students and that language cannot be “specific” for every area.
Although some of the information is outdated it makes sense in some points.
Finally, I believe, there has to be a deep analysis involved,
in order to gather all the data available for the future of language teaching,
and also to generate improvement rather than gaps in the process. The approaches
have to evolve and serve the current situation of the society. I think that ESP
and specificity are related in that aspect: both of them work together to
create a better way of learning and teaching. Both of them are tools in the process.
And all of this cannot happen if there is no analysis in the mix. For teachers
or researchers to tailor something better and up-to-date they have to work
along side with the students and all the stakeholders to truly fulfill those
needs.
Hi! Glori
ReplyDeleteI really like the way you have structured your reply: a figure to illlustrate your analysis and some questions to guide the discussion. Thus, specificity leads teachers to employ very different choices in terms of how much the teachers need to know of the speciality of their students. Well done!
It was a little difficult to wrap my head around the term...I guess that is why I wanted to write about it, so I tried to research about it and in most places it refered to the specificity in terms of content not specifically the teachers knowledge, but thank you for the clarification!
Delete